Federal Crown Prosecutor charged with conspiring to obstruct justice

CRA agent charged with perjury, again

On August 22 2005 Judge Hogan issued a summons for lawyer Ross G. Young to come to Court on November 28 2005 on one count of conspiring to obstruct/ pervert /defeat justice. File 33369 in the Provincial Court of British Columbia Penticton registry.

Ross G. Young, of the Cranbrook lawfirm of Hislop Colgur & Young, had been the Agent for the Attorney General of Canada in a 2003 case where Jozef Rudolf faced charges of failing to file income tax returns. In such cases, the Canada Revenue Agency officer who handles the investigation lays the charge. But Mr. Young arranged with the CRA Agent to have the lawfirm?s receptionist be the Informant.

Since she was not qualified under section 244 of the federal Income Tax Act to lay such charges, and Mr. Young must have known that, then, by arranging for Linda Chadwick to lay the charges, they defrauded the Justice of the Peace who received the Information. Linda Chadwick, employed by the lawfirm Hislop Colgur and Young, is charged with one count of ?personation?, contrary to section 130 of the Criminal Code.

CRA agent Tracy Ellen Todd is charged with seven counts of perjury, on the ground that she had sworn out affidavits of personal service upon Jozef Rudolf, when in fact she had not. In early 2004, as his case proceeded in Provincial Court in Creston, Jozef Rudolf repeatedly pointed out to Ross. G. Young that the notes of CRA agent Todd, contained in the disclosure packet, proved that she had lied, as she swore in Affidavits she had served him notices personally, when she had not.

Yet despite undeniable perjury on the part of the Crown?s own witness, on three separate Court dates, Prosecutor Young disregarded the Accused?s protestation and moved the thing ahead. Finally on May 21 2004, the charges were stayed by the federal Crown. I believe that the only reason this happened is because the corruption was drawn to the attention of the Minister of National Revenue and the Minister of Justice.

The Agent for the Attorney General of British Columbia sat in on the Process Hearing on August 22 2005. The Criminal Justice Branch will now take over the case and do its own investigation. Which is what happened last year after Provincial Court Judge Philips issued process on the same charges of perjury against Tracy Todd. The Crown then smothered those charges with the excuse that prosecution ?was not in the public interest.?

But now, a year later, I showed Judge Hogan material indicating that Todd?s false affidavits had been part of a bigger agenda of the Public Service Alliance of Canada co-operating with the Canada Revenue Agency to abuse the powers at their disposal for destroying those who would criticize the income tax system. Back in about 1998, one of the questions Mr. Rudolf had confronted CRA agent Todd with was, ?where is the law requiring me to use your so-called Form T1 General to file?? To which Todd (and all the rest of the CRA agents) would simply go mute, refusing to discharge Revenue Canada?s advertised duty of care to advise the citizen on the state of the law as it applied to them.

The malicious prosecutions fomented against him, and others who were vocal in the Tax Honesty Movement, were primarily for demonizing people who simply demanded ?show me the law?, rather than for proper administration of the Income Tax Act. I advised Judge Hogan of what had happened in the Supreme Court of British Columbia at Vancouver, July 19th 2005, when I forced the federal Crown Counsel to admit that there is no law compelling someone to use CRA?s format to file returns of income.

Thus, from former Minister Cauchon, and that obscene insult to every right-thinking Canadian, namely Elinor Kaplan, to the present Minister McCallum, on down the hierarchy ; each and every one of those CRA personnel with whom I dealt are court-certified liars. They knew they had the duty to tell me the truth, yet they did the opposite.

The lie about the Form T1 having any weight in has come to an end. I believe that with these charges being authorized, the tide has turned in the Tax Honesty Movement in Canada. This judge listened and acted appropriately. The Private Prosecution is a stilleto for making government insiders accountable for the crimes THEY commit while perpetrating the income tax racket. Let us learn how to use it and apply it judiciously.

Gordon S. Watson Justice critic for the Party of Citizens Who Have Decided To Think For Themselves & Be Their Own Politicians

Box 63009 RPO Highgate 7155 Kingsway Burnaby British Columbia V5E 4J6