homepage Letter of Sept 15th, 2005 Observation Oct 27, 2006 JULY 15 2005 ATTN: SASKATCHEWAN LAW SOCIETY FAXED TO 306-352-2989 THIS IS A DRAFT LETTER ADDRESSED TO YOUR ENTIRE ORGANIZATION. IF ANYONE THERE FEELS THE NECESSITY OF REPORTING IRREGULARITIES, I WOULD SUGGEST YOU NOT USE A ONE OF LAWYERS IN THE REGINA AREA OF SASKATCHEWAN I HAVE MENTIONED HERE, WHEN THINGS GO WRONG THEIR INTERESTS WILL BE PROTECTED OVER YOURS. THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST COME FIRST NOT LAST. AS A FORMER FORENSIC AUDITOR , I NOW WAS LOOKING FORWARD TO SLOWLY RETIRING, HOWEVER THE SITUATION HERE IN ALL MY YEARS HAS MADE MY TOP 5 LIST. I DO NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE, HOWEVER I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU CAN OBTAIN PROPER LEGAL ADVICE IN THIS AREA AND THAT FORCES MYSELF AND MY CLIENTS TO ACT FOR OURSELVES. I AM AN INDEPENDENT AUDITOR NOW HELPING PEOPLE THAT NEED HELP RESOLVING FINANCIAL MATTERS. THE LEGAL SYSTEM HERE AS MANY OF YOU ARE AWARE SIMPLY DOES NOT WORK FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE PUBLIC ANY MORE. ITS TIME FOR CHANGE AND PLEASE DO NOT FEAR. YOU CANNOT BE BULLIED IF YOU DO NOT ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE BULLIED. COPIES OF THIS FIRST LETTER WILL BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE PROVINCE THROUGH THE VICTIMS I HAVE MENTIONED IN THIS LETTER. ANY OF YOU MAY CONTACT ME DIRECTLY IF YOU WISH. I WILL BE SETTING UP DATES FOR LOCAL MEETINGS AND I HOPE THE PUBLIC WILL ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE. OUR AREA HAS BEEN HIJACKED BY UNSCRUPULOUS LAWYERS, ACCOUNTANTS AND POLITICIANS OF ALL LEVELS. WE MUST PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AND WORK WITH OUR SIMILARITIES NOT DIFFERENCES. WE CANNOT BLAME OTHERS FOR OUR SITUATION AND SOMEHOW I FEEL THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO ACHEIVE RESULTS TO MAKE EVERYONE SAFE AND SECURE FROM THE FRAUD AND DECEIT GOING ON TODAY. CHECK OUT THE CTV NEWS WEBSITE UNDER, HOUSE STEALING. YOU AND YOUR MEMBERS ARE IGNORING THIS REALITY. 72 LAWYERS IN ONTARIO AND COUNTING ARE BEING INVESTIGATED. HERE IS SOME EXAMPLES OF SEVERAL FILES BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION. ALL PARTIES NAMED HAVE BEEN ADVISED AND AWARE OF MY REPORTS. LET US BEGIN..... AS I PREVIOUSLY INFORMED YOU I WOULD COMMUNICATE MY FINDINGS AS FILES ARE BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION. THIS IS THE LATEST EXAMPLE AND 4 OF YOUR MEMBER LAW FIRMS WERE INVOLVED WITH MY CLIENT. I WILL LIST THEM. EACH ONE INVOLVED IN THE LIES, DECEIT AND CON-ARTISTRY TO PROTECT THEIR INTERESTS AND NOT MY CLIENTS. ON ONE OCCASSION ALONE OVER 200,000 DOLLARS SIMPLY VANISHED. ON ANOTHER OCCASION 80,000 DOLLARS WAS UNNACOUNTED FOR. THIS LIST GOES ON AND ON. MY CLIENT WAS NOT GIVEN AN OPPURTUNITY TO OBTAIN INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE AND THE MAIN PRINCIPAL WAS ILL AND YOUR MEMBER FIRM TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THIS SITUATION AND HIS BEHAVIOUR WAS A DISGUSTING SHOW OF DECEIT THAT TOOK ADVANTAGE OF MY CLIENTS MEDICAL CONDITION. I BELIEVE THAT HIS SHARING OF INFORMATION TO THE OTHER SIDE WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY. PART OF THE PROBLEM HERE THAT I HAVE DISCOVERED IS THE ARROGANCE OF YOUR MEMBERS AND THEIR UNNACOUNTABILTY. WHEN THERE ARE TWO SIDES IN A CIVIL DISPUTE YOUR MEMBERS TAKE FOR GRANTED THE CONFIDENTIALLTY OF THE MATTERS AT HAND. IF ONE OR BOTH SIDES HAVE POLITICAL INFLUENCE OR AN UPPERHAND AND YOU DO NOT ADVISE THE WEAKER SIDE, THE RESULTS CAN BE DISASTRIOUS AS THEY WERE HERE FOR MY CLIENT. I BELIEVE THAT THE 4 LAWFIRMS I HAVE LISTED AS WELL AS THE 2 ACCOUNTING FIRMS ACTED WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE AND INTENT TO DESTROY MY CLIENT FOR A VARIETY OF UNETHICAL REASONS. I HAVE BEEN SHOWN A FILE THAT PROVES THAT SEVERAL OF YOUR MEMBERS WERE IN SOME KIND OF FINANCIAL ASSOCIATION TO INVEST MONEY. EACH FILE HAD THEIR ORIGINAL SIGNATURES AND ITS ASTOUNDING THAT YOUR MR. SCHNELL AND HIS COHORTS HAVE DENIED BEING AWARE OF THIS. I BELIEVE THAT HE AND HIS CON ARTIST COHORTS ARE FULLY AWARE OF THIS AND AS THE OTHER TYPES OF ENRON/WORLDCOMS/MARTHA STEWARTS/RANKINS/STIELS/ADELPHIAS/THE LIST GOES ON AND ON. YOUR MEMBERS HAVE FORGOTTEN WERE YOUR PRIORITIES ARE AND THIS IS WHY I HOPE YOU WILL BE AUDITED THOUROUGHLY TO ESTABLISH YOUR FUNDS AND SOLVE YOUR EVOLVED DECEPTIONS. THIS FILE IS OVER 20 YEARS OLD (SOME LONGER) AND WAS DISCOVERED IN A PILE OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS BEING BURNED AT THE LOCAL INDIAN HEAD DUMP. THE REST OF THE FILE WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE REFILLING OF WASCANA LAKE. ONE OF YOUR MEMBER FIRMS IN REGINA WAS TRUSTED WITH THIS MATERIAL AND THE PART THEY HAD HAS DISSAPPEARED. ITS A GOOD THING THE CLIENT KEPT THE ORIGINALS. HERE ARE THE MAIN LIST (OTHERS WILL FOLLOW AS THE FILE IS REVIEWED) 1) BALFOUR MOSS 2) OLIVE WALLER 3) GERAND,RATH 4) DUCHIN I WILL NEVER REFER ANY OF MY CLIENTS TO DEAL WITH THESE FIRMS OR ANYONE ELSE THAT MAYBE RELATED TO ANY OF THESE PEOPLE. UNTIL COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS ARE INDEPENDENTLY DEALT WITH. I DO NOT TRUST ANY OF YOUR MEMBERS DUE TO CONFLICTS OF ALL KINDS INCLUDING POLITICS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. EITHER DO MY CLIENTS WHO YOU AND YOUR MEMBERS HAVE MADE A MOCKERY OF THEIR RIGHTS AND USED YOUR KNOWLEDGE FOR YOUR OWN GAINS. SHAME ON YOU. FOR EXAMPLE... I REALIZE THAT YOU WILL ARGUE THAT A LAWYER MUST BE PRESENT TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF PARTY OR PARTIES. I DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT AS LONG AS THE LAWYER IS ACTING IN THE PARTIES INTEREST AND NOT THEIRS. YOUR ORGANIZATION HAS PROVEN TO ME THAT YOUR ETHICS SIMPLY DO NOT APPLY AND A CHANGE AND TOTAL REFORM MUST BE DONE TO CORRECT ANYMORE BETRAYAL OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST HERE IN THE REGINA, SASKATCHEWAN AND SURROUNDING AREAS. AS MORE FILES ARE BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION I WILL ADD FURTHER JURISDICTIONS AS REQUIRED THE ABOVE FOR EXAMPLE DOES NOT EXIST HERE..... THIS ALSO INVOLVES COLLUSION WITH 2 ACCOUNTING FIRMS 1) SKILNICK AND ASSOCIATES. 2) DUDLEY AND PARTNERS 1a) WHOEVER THEIR LAWYERS ARE SKILINICKS LAWYER HAD THE NERVE TO ASK ME FOR AN APOLOGY FOR THEIR CLIENT WHOS BOOKS ARE WORSE THAN ENRONS. THIS ALONE PROVES MY ALLIGATIONS WITHOUT A DOUBT. 2a) THE SAME APPLIES FOR DUDLEY WHO IS IN CONFLICT AND COLLUSION WITH THE SK GOVT. THEY SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO HAVE ACCESS TO ANY PRIVATE CORPORATION. THIS CONFLICT ALSO APPLIES TO SKILNICK AND HIS COHORTING BAND OF INTIMIDATING THUGS.BOTH THESE FIRMS WERE INVOLVED IN THE DEMISE OF MY CLIENT AND I BELIEVE AFTER A PROPER INQUIRY THERE WILL BE MORE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. SKILNICK ALSO ADVISED ME THAT HE OWNED OVER 50% OF THE PROVINCES AUDITS AND DUDLEY THE REST. IT WAS NONE OF THE PUBLICS (WHO PAYS FOR THIS) BUSINESS AS THEY WERE NOT HIS CLIENT. ONE OF MY CLIENTS ATTEMPTED TO COMMUNICATE WITH HIM AND HE WAS ASKED TO LEAVE. THIS IS A BREACH OF RIGHTS AGAINST THE PUBLIC. MY RESULTS HAVE BEEN THE SAME WITH BOTH OF THESE FIRMS. I WONDER WHAT EVERYONE IS HIDING. 3) THE 4 OF YOUR MEMBER FIRMS I HAVE MENTIONED DEPEND ON BOTH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND GOVT FOR THEIR FUNDS, THIS CONFLICT WOULD ALSO APPLY TO THESE FIRMS WHO I BELIEVE ARE SEPERATE IN NAME ONLY. A PUBLIC INQUIRY WILL ALSO PROVE FURTHER INFORMATION. I SAY THIS BECAUSE I BELIEVE THE INTIMIDATION TACTICS WILL SHOW AND WHO KNOWS HOW MANY OF THE PUBLIC WILL BECOME MORE UNSUSPECTING VICTIMS. MANY WILL RECEIVE COPIES OF OUR LETTERS. MANY HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISTRIBUTED BY YOUR PAST VICTIMS AND DESPITE THEIR FINANCIAL DEMISE HAVE 100S OF VOLUNTEERS IN WAITING FOR THEIR COMPENSATION. SOME OF THEM HAVE ALSO BEEN CONNED INTO YOUR LATEST ESCAPADE OF COLLABORATIVE LAW. WHAT A FARCE AND CONFLICT THIS CAN BE TO THE UNSUSPECTING FUTURE VICTIM OF YOUR MEMBERS.ONE OF MY CLIENTS WAS NOT EVEN TOLD ABOUT THIS, WHICH SHOWS ME WHAT YOUR MEMBERS ARE CAPABLE OF. YOUR MEMBER IN THIS FILE CHARGED HER OVER 30 THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR SOMETHING THAT SHOULD OF BEEN HANDLED IN A HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL NOT COURT. THIS IS ONE OF THE DECEPTIONS I SPOKE ABOUT. I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS SYTEM WOULD BE SHOWN TO ANYONE THAT INVOLVES ANY OF YOUR MEMBERS FOR THE EXACT REASONS I HAVE MENTIONED. YOU WILL BE HEARING FROM MANY OF THEM AS THEY COME ON BOARD. FINALLY THE FIRST OF MANY CIVIL ACTIONS TO FOLLOW IS NOW IN PROCESS OF BEING PREPARED AND I WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY JUDGES THAT HAVE BEEN RELATED TO ANY OF THESE LAW FIRMS PRIOR TO THEIR APPOINTMENTS. ONE OF MY REASONS FOR THIS IS DUE TO A FEW MATTERS THAT YOUR ORGANIZATION WERE INFORMED OF. I BELIEVE YOU HAVE VIOLATED OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BEGINNING WITH OUR SECTION 11d OF OUR CHARTER OF RIGHTS. 1) THE TOWN OF INDIAN HEADS LAWYER IS DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH THE BURNING OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS. THE CHIEF JUSTICE WAS INFORMED OF THIS VIOLATION AND CHOSE TO IGNORE IT. WHY NOT ITS HIS FORMER BOSS AND THE RESULTS OF THESE ACTIONS WOULD BE UNFAVOURABLE TO BOTH OF THEM. 2) YOUR MEMBERS LAW FIRM SEEMS TO HAVE A HISTORY OF DESTROYING DOCUMENTS AND THEN DUMPING THE FILE TO THE NEXT LEVEL IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM. THIS ARROGANCE AND CONDUCT CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH CONFLICT AND DECEIT AND COLLUSION AND SO ON AND SO ON. ONE USUALLY QUESTIONS DECISIONS OF THE COURT THROUGH APPEAL, HOWEVER CONDUCT AND CONFLICT IS ENTIRELY A SEPERATE MATTER AND ONCE AGAIN SECTION 11d OF THE CHARTER APPLIES HERE. I STAND BY MY REPORTS AND I WILL DO ALL I CAN TO LEGALLY CORRECT THIS SITUATION. LETS MOVE ON... 3) YOUR MEMBERS LAW FIRM PUT THROUGH A FALSE DOCUMENT IN A RECENT FORECLOSURE ACTION. HE NEVER THOUGHT HE WOULD GET CAUGHT. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I CAUGHT HIM ABUSING OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. YOUR ORGANIZATION AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE WERE INFORMED AND AGAIN I SAY THIS CAN ONLY BE DONE FOR REASONS MENTIONED ABOVE. YOUR MEMBER ADVISED THE DEFENDENT, ONE OF WHICH IS HIS CLIENT?. THIS CONDUCT IS DISGUSTING AND REFUTES OUR FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPALS OF JUSTICE. SINCE WHEN IS FORGERY NOT A MISCONDUCT??? JUST ASK FORMER JUDGE VICTOR BARRON (63 YEARS OLD AND IN JAIL) IN BROOKLYN (NY USA COURTS) MY HATS OFF TO THE FORENSIC AUDITORS THERE AND THE AUTHORITIES WHO APPRECIATED THEIR HELP DUE TO MANPOWER SHORTAGES UNTIL IT CAME ALL TOGETHER. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS BEING REVIEWED THERE. I DOUBT THERE WILL MUCH OF HIS PENSION LEFT WHEN ALL HIS AND HIS COHORTS COMPENSATE THEIR VICTIMS. I BELIEVE THE SAME SITUATION APPLIES HERE IN AT LEAST THE REGINA AND SURROUNDING AREAS. I HAVE MANY VOLUNTEERS WILLING AND ABLE TO HELP AND COMPARE NOTES. PLEASE DO NOT LET ANYMORE OF YOUR MEMBERS OR THEIR CLIENTS BURN OR DESTROY DOCUMENTS, PUBLIC OR OTHERWISE. 4) YOUR MEMBERS LAWFIRM PARTICIPATED IN TERRORRIZING A DYING MAN IN INDIAN HEAD. AGAIN JUST MORE COLLUSION AND SO ON. HIS FILE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF AND HIS WIDOW WILL BE PART OF OUR FIRST ACTION AGAINST ALL OF YOU. THIS ON TOP OF WHAT THIS FIRM DID TO MY OTHER CLIENT WHO WAS ILL. IS BEING ON A ROLL PLEASING TO YOU AND YOUR COHORTS? THEY TRUSTED YOU AND YOU BETRAYED THEM. OF COURSE YOU TOOK THEIR MONEY FIRST WITH FULL INTENTIONS FOR REASONS I HAVE MENTIONED. DONT WORRY, ACTUALLY I WOULD WORRY IF I WERE YOU, THERE ARE OVER 300 FILES AND COUNTING THAT I AND OTHERS HAVE SEEN THAT PROVE THESE FACTS AND SO FAR THERE IS NOTHING TO MAKE ME NOT STAND BY MY REPORTS. JUDGING BY MATTERS LIKE THIS I BELIEVE THE COMPENSATION DUE TO THESE COHORTS ACTIONS OVER THE YEARS WILL BE IN THE TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS JUST FOR THE FILES THAT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION. REMEMBER THERE ARE THOSE WHO ARE PRIVELAGED AND THOSE WHO ABUSE PRIVELAGE. YOU AND YOUR MEMBERS ARE THE LATTER AND SO ARE ANY/ELSE ASSOCIATED WITH YOU THAT FOLLOW THIS BEHAVIOUR. THIS ENDS PART ONE OF YOUR NOTICE OF NOTICE OF PENDING LITIGATION TO COME. I REALIZE YOU AND YOUR MEMBERS WILL BE IN A FIGHT OVER THIS AS YOU AND YOUR MEMBERS TRY TO KEEP AFLOAT. I SUGGEST YOU SPEAK TO THE VICTIMS OF THE ENRON/WORLDCOMS/MARTHA STEWARTS AND SO ON AND ADD UP THEIR LOSSES SO YOU CAN COMPARE IT TO ALL YOUR VICTIMS, ESPECIALLY THE FILES THAT I HAVE MADE YOU AWARE OF. FINALLY ALL EVERYONE WANTS IS A PROPER SYSTEM RUN AS IT SHOULD BE NOT SHOULDNT BE, AND TO BE DESTROYED BY A FEW BAD APPLES IS UNACCEPTABLE. REMEMBER WE CAN ALL WORK WITH OUR SIMILARITIES NOT DIFFERENCES TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS UNDER A RULE OF LAW AND FREEDOM WE ALL DESERVE. THATS ALL FOR NOW. ANTHONY GAVRIELIDES IND AUDITOR BX 1509 INDIAN HEAD SK SOG 2KO EMAIL: gabfincons@sasktel.net OR gabfincons@hotmail.com PLEASE NOTE: I DO NOT ACCEPT REGISTERED MAIL UNLESS YOU CALL IN ADVANCE. IF YOU DO NOT, IT MAY BE RETURNED. I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE ALL REGULAR MAIL. IF YOU RECEIVE ANY LETTERS THAT ARE NOT IN UPPERCASE, THEY ARE NOT MINE. THIS IS DONE FOR EASIER READING AND COPYING. .